National Academy of Public Administration
Projects Events Publications Contact Site Map


Current Projects
U.S. Park Police Follow-up Study

Client/Funder:
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Park Police (posted: 11/19/2003)

Purpose and Scope:

In August 2001, the National Academy of Public Administration (Academy) issued a report entitled The U.S. Park Police: Focusing Priorities, Capabilities, and Resources for the Future. The report was prepared in response to a mandate in the Conference Report accompanying the 2001 Appropriations for the Department of the Interior (DOI) and Related Agencies. Congress believed there was a need to improve accountability within and oversight of the U.S. Park Police (USPP) budget. The Academy's report contained 20 recommendations pertaining to the USPP's mission and structure, its roles and functions, and its budgeting and staffing.

Since the report was issued 2 years ago, a new Chief of the USPP was appointed and some of the report's recommendations are in various stages of implementation. In addition, increased emphasis has been placed on the protection of park monuments in the Washington, DC area and at the Statue of Liberty. The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security, increased local, state, and federal counterterrorism activities, and improved law enforcement cooperation and coordination may also be affecting USPP's roles, functions, and the organizational structure being used to carry them out. In the light of these developments, the Interior and Related Agencies Subcommittee has asked that the Academy follow up on the recommendations made in its report to determine the status of implementation.

There will be two phases for the study

Phase 1: Follow-up of Academy Panel August 2001 Recommendations.

Phase 2: Evaluate USPP mission, roles and functions, the resources allocated to them and relative priority.

Center:

Management Studies

Project Director:

Kenneth Ryder

Project Status:

Ongoing

Panel:

The Academy has appointed the following individuals to a Panel to oversee and direct the study. The public may send comments on the composition of the panel for a period of seven (7) days after the posted date to mditmeyer@napawash.org.

Royce Hanson (Chair)--Research Professor, Institute of Public Policy at George Washington University. Former Visiting Professor, Policy Science Graduate Program, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Professor and Dean, School of Social Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas; Associate Dean and Professor, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota; Senior Staff Officer, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences; Chairman, Montgomery County (Maryland) Planning Board; Chairman, Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission.

Frank Chellino*-Special Agent in Charge, Miami Field Division, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA); Vice Chairman, Executive Committee, Washington/Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. Prior Headquarters positions with DEA: Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Inspections; Unit Chief, Office of Security Programs. Prior positions with DEA: Special Agent in Charge, Washington Division Office; Supervisory Senior Inspector, Public Information Officer, Special Agent, Miami Division Office; Special Agent, New York Division Office.

Bennie R. Click-Police Practices Consultant, Member of Governing Board State Bar of Arizona, Chairman National Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training, Adjunct Faculty Ottawa University. Former Police Chief Dallas Texas, Acting Assistant City Manager Dallas Texas, Seventeen positions in Phoenix Police Department including Executive Assistant Police Chief. Member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Police Executive Research Forum, and the National Executive Institute.

Thomas C. Frazier*-Criminal Justice Consultant, Former, Director, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice; Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department; increasingly responsible positions with the San Jose Police Department, including Commander of every Departmental Bureau; President, Police Executive Research Forum; Chair, Executive Committee, Washington/Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area; U.S. Army Intelligence.

Kristine Marcy-Consultant, McConnell International, LLC. Former Chief Operating Officer, Small Business Administration; Senior Counsel, Detention and Deportation, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Assistant Director for Prisoner Services, U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Department of Justice; Associate Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice; Acting Director/Deputy Director, Office of Construction Management and Deputy Budget Director, U.S. Department of the Interior; Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education; Assistant Director, Human Resources, Veterans and Labor Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

* Not an Academy Fellow


Meetings:

Meeting 1: January 30, 2004 (closed) (posted 1/16/04)
Meeting 2: March 29, 2004 (closed) (posted 3/22/04)
Meeting 3: May 25, 2004 (closed) (posted 5/17/04)

For further information, contact Marty Ditmeyer at (202) 347-3190, or at MDitmeyer@napawash.org.

 

2001 National Academy of Public Administration. All rights reserved.
900 7th Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-347-3190 Fax: 202-393-0993
Academy Staff Only | Contact Webmaster | Privacy Policy
This site created by e.magination network, llc
 
Search Entire Site

Board of Directors Meeting
May 31-June 3, 2006
Las Vegas, Nevada

Academy Calendar

Academy Fellow Tackles
the Ethics of Dissent

Guerrillas in government are all around us, writes Academy Fellow Rosemary O’Leary in her new book, “The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government.” The term “guerrilla government” describes career public servants who work against the wishes of their superiors which, O’Leary states, happens more than we may realize in government’s bureaucracy.

O’Leary says guerrillas often choose to remain “in the closet,” moving clandestinely behind the scenes, such as “Deep Throat” or the DMV clerk who deliberately slows the processing of a driver’s license application. Guerrilla dissent is carried out by those who are dissatisfied with the actions of public organizations, programs—or by people who choose not to go public with their concerns.

Ultimately, O’Leary found in her research that public servants and managers could benefit from addressing guerrilla activity. She says they should carefully listen to the creative ideas of these dissenters, even encourage debate, so that constructive changes in the system can be made.

Buy “The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government”.


 

 

National Academy of Public Administration