National Academy of Public Administration
Projects Events Publications Contact Site Map


Current Projects
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Review of Patent Work Processes and Organizational Structure

Client/Funder:
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(posted: 9/15/2004)

Purpose and Scope:

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect interests of authors and inventors. The patent process is significant for the U.S. economy and the volume and complexity of this process has grown rapidly in the past decade. This has resulted in increased time to process patents and raised concerns about the quality of some issued patents as well as the associated search process.

To help ensure that USPTO is on a path to effectively achieve modernization, the House Appropriations Committee, through the Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, has asked the National Academy of Public Administration (Academy) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to work cooperatively to examine the following areas:

  • The progress USPTO has made in achieving its 21st Century Strategic Plan milestones.
  • The challenges USPTO faces in meeting these milestones-specifically those related to improving the quality and timeliness of patent examinations, greater reliance on electronic information and processing systems, and attracting and retaining a quality workforce.
  • The extent to which the organization's structure and patent review process are appropriate to:
    o fulfill the strategic plan goals,
    o increase patent quality, and
    o decrease the rate of patent pendency.
  • The extent to which USPTO has a suitable allocation and skill mix of employees.

The Academy's portion of the study will review business processes and the extent to which they contribute to the timeliness of patent examinations, the extent of stakeholder confidence in USPTO's ability to manage its workload, and how USPTO can improve communication with key stakeholders so they obtain necessary information. Part of the study will examine processes used by the European and Japanese Patent Offices, to see if there are efficiencies they employ that could be applicable to USPTO.

Center:

Academy Studies

Project Director:

Elaine Orr

Project Status:

Ongoing

Panel:

The Academy has appointed the following individuals to a Panel to oversee and direct the study. The public may send comments on the composition of the panel for a period of seven (7) days after the posted date to mditmeyer@napawash.org.

Tom Stanton*( Chair)- Financial and Legal Policy Consultant; Fellow, Center for the Study of American Government, Johns Hopkins University; Chair, Standing Panel on Executive Organization and Management, National Academy of Public Administration; Former Partner, Wellford, Wegman, and Hoff; Associate General Counsel, Federal National Mortgage Association; Acting Director and Deputy Director, Office of Policy and Planning, U.S. Federal Trade Commission; Director, Housing Research Group; Director, Tax Reform Research Group.

Marilu Goodyear*-Vice Chancellor for Information Services, Chief Information Officer and Associate Professor, Stene Graduate Program in Public Administration, University of Kansas, Lawrence. Former Associate Vice Chancellor for Information Services and Associate Dean, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Senior Associate Director, Associate Professor, Interim Director of Libraries, and Assistant Director for Collection Interpretation, Texas A&M University; Assistant Director for Public Services, University Library, Iowa State University; Assistant Director for Instruction and Research Services, University of Colorado at Denver.

Bernard Ross*-Professor, School of Public Affairs, American University. Former Director, World Capitals Program, and Chair, Department of Public Administration, School of Public Affairs, American University; Director, Urban Affairs Program, Center for Urban Public Policy Analysis; Director, National Center for State and Local Government.

Daniel L. Skoler*-Consultant and Contract Adjudicator. Former Vice President for Policy and Advocacy, National Council on Aging; Associate Commissioner, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Social Security Administration; Director, Division of Continuing Education and Training, Federal Judicial Center; Deputy Associate Commissioner, Social Security Administration; Chairman, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and Deputy Assistant Commissioner, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Director, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice; Executive Director, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges; Director of Public Service Activities, American Bar Association.

Charles Van Horn -Partner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P, and Chairman of the Patent Practice Committee for Intellectual Property Owners. Former Deputy Assistant Commissioner for Patent Policy, Deputy Solicitor, Director of Patent Examining Group in Organic Chemistry and Biotechnology, Petitions Examiner, Patent Examiner, Electrophotographic Materials and Processes, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

* Academy Fellow


Meetings:

Meeting 1: October 13, 2004 (posted 10/4/04)
Meeting 2: December 14, 2004 (posted 12/1/04)
Meeting 3: March 2, 2005 (closed) (posted 2/18/05)
Meeting 4: March 14, 2005 (closed) (posted 3/8/2005)
Meeting 5: May 2, 2005 (closed) (posted 4/26/05)
Meeting 6: June 3, 2005 (closed) (posted 5/23/05)


For further information, contact Marty Ditmeyer at (202) 347-3190, or at MDitmeyer@napawash.org.

 

2001 National Academy of Public Administration. All rights reserved.
900 7th Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-347-3190 Fax: 202-393-0993
Academy Staff Only | Contact Webmaster | Privacy Policy
This site created by e.magination network, llc
 
Search Entire Site

Board of Directors Meeting
May 31-June 3, 2006
Las Vegas, Nevada

Academy Calendar

Academy Fellow Tackles
the Ethics of Dissent

Guerrillas in government are all around us, writes Academy Fellow Rosemary O’Leary in her new book, “The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government.” The term “guerrilla government” describes career public servants who work against the wishes of their superiors which, O’Leary states, happens more than we may realize in government’s bureaucracy.

O’Leary says guerrillas often choose to remain “in the closet,” moving clandestinely behind the scenes, such as “Deep Throat” or the DMV clerk who deliberately slows the processing of a driver’s license application. Guerrilla dissent is carried out by those who are dissatisfied with the actions of public organizations, programs—or by people who choose not to go public with their concerns.

Ultimately, O’Leary found in her research that public servants and managers could benefit from addressing guerrilla activity. She says they should carefully listen to the creative ideas of these dissenters, even encourage debate, so that constructive changes in the system can be made.

Buy “The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government”.


 

 

National Academy of Public Administration