|
2003 Wildland Fire Study
As requested by the House Appropriations
Subcommittee for Interior and Related Agencies, the U.S. Forest
Service and the Department of the Interior jointly funded an
independent Academy study of methods for implementing certain
recommendations in the Academy's September 2002 report, Wildfire
Suppression: Strategies for Containing Costs. The study,
which started in January 2003, produced three reports:
- Enhancing Hazard Mitigation Capacity
- Utilizing Local Firefighting Forces
- Improving Equipment and Services Acquisition
Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Capacity
In many parts of
the nation, the capacity of state and community organizations
to address the widespread risk of wildland fire is far from
adequate. This portion of the study explored administrative
improvements, amendments to existing programs, and potential
new provisions of law that would:
- Facilitate collaborative actions for
reducing wildland fire risks to communities and the environment
- Improve coordination and effectiveness
of existing intergovernmental aid programs for this purpose
(available from the federal land management agencies, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, and states)
- Make existing aid easier to obtain and
use
- Increase the capacity of mitigation cooperators
and help them reach financially and technically realistic
goals
The final report
was issued in January 2004.
Containing
Wildland Fire Costs:
Enhancing Hazard Mitigation Capacity
Panel
Report (PDF)
Report
in Brief (PDF)
Background
(PDF)
HTML
format
Utilizing Local Firefighting Forces
on Wildland Fires
Local fire departments - paid and unpaid,
urban and rural - are a huge potential resource for fighting
wildfires, but barriers to wildfire training and qualification
often prevent them from doing so. This portion of the study
examined ways to increase the availability of local fire -
fighting forces for wildfires, and to better integrate local
forces into wildfire response. The final report, released
in December 2003, includes recommendations to make training
and certification of local firefighters more widely, easily,
and inexpensively available; and to develop leadership teams
committed to managing local fires, even when many firefighters
have been deployed to other areas.
Containing
Wildland Fire Costs: Utilizing Local Firefighting Forces
PDF
format
HTML
format
Method of Supply System for Major
Firefighting Equipment and Services
Major equipment and services for fighting
large wildfires are provided by a variety of means including
national contracts, regional contracts, state contracts, purchases
off local economies, and cooperative use of existing federal,
state, local, tribal, and volunteer resources. In most cases,
the sources of supply are not systematically analyzed and
compared to assess which are most cost-effective. Several
other federal agencies have been able to save money by performing
such evaluations. This portion of the study examined the acquisition
systems of other federal agencies in order to develop a methodology
for acquiring these items for the agencies having wildfire
responsibilities. The potential for cost savings was demonstrated
with examples. The final report was issued in September 2003.
Containing
Wildland Fire Costs: Improving Equipment and Services Acquisition
PDF
format
HTML
format
PREVIOUS WILDLAND FIRE STUDIES
Academy Panels have been studying
wildland fire issues since 2000. They have examined the adequacy
of the 1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy, made
recommendations to improve implementation of the Policy, and
developed strategies for containing suppression costs, in
addition to the issues addressed in the 2003 study. Reports
from those studies are linked below.
Wildfire Suppression (September
2002)
An Academy Panel has found that federal,
state, and local agencies must strike at the main causes of
wildland fires to bring the costs of fighting them under control.
These costs have increased dramatically with the buildup of
hazardous fuels, rising home construction in fire-prone areas,
and severe drought. The Panel focused on federal wildfire
assistance to state and local governments, and offered steps
to better prepare federal, state, local, and tribal officials
to work together. Studies of six large fires from 2001 formed
the basis for the findings and recommendations.
The Panel's report, Wildfire Suppression:
Strategies for Containing Costs, is available in two parts.
The shorter report provides the recommendations, and the longer
Background and Research Report provides the case studies and
other research on which the Panel based its recommendations.
Free
Online Report (77 pages)
Background
and Research Report (462 pages)
Due to the size of the Background and Research
report, it has been broken up into sections:
Chapters 1-2
Chapters 3-5
Chapters 6-8
Appendix A-E
Appendix
F
Appendix G-J
Supplement
Managing Wildland Fire: Enhancing
Capacity to Implement the Federal Interagency Policy
(December 2001)
An Academy
Panel has recommended an organizational structure and other
management tools for enhancing the federal land management
agencies' capacity for managing wildland fire. Strong leadership
and coordination already exist for operational firefighting
activities, but the Panel found that ecosystem health, fire
hazard reduction, and community safety goals contained in
the agencies' fire management policy must be addressed immediately
in a more consistent and accountable manner by all of such
agencies. Otherwise, the threat of unnaturally severe wildfires
will continue to grow, putting both communities and ecosystems
at increasing risk.
The study, Managing Wildland Fire:
Enhancing Capacity to Implement the Federal Interagency
Policy, offers recommendations that are consistent with
the President's Management Agenda, which directs federal
agencies to face the urgent management challenges confronting
them.
Free
Online Report
(December 2000)
This report was prepared for the
Department of Interior and contains perspectives on the
Cerro Grande Fire and issues recommended for further study
in Phase II. Phase II will examine the implementation of
the 2001 fire policy, and present an Academy panel's recommendations
on how its implementation can be improved. The Phase II
report will be published in Fall 2001.
Free Online
Report
|