Government By Contract: The White House Needs Capacity to Review and Revise the Legacy of 20th Century Reform by Dan Guttman


Download Report

Executive Summary

The federal government overly relies on grant and contractor employees to perform the basic work of government.The core presumption of law that officials have the experience and expertise needed to account for the work of contractors and, by extension, the basic work of government, is no longer valid.  This development is neither an accident nor recent.  It is the predictable and predicted product of mid-20th century reform that produced profound successes, but left a legacy of fundamental questions that have lain unexamined by Congress and the Executive.  The White House needs the capacity to understand this legacy and revise the reform for the 21st century.  Based on the author’s assessment:

  • The White House needs capacity to know which vital government functions may no longer be within the grasp of officials—and the extent to which longstanding White House policy barring contractor performance of inherently governmental functions is a placebo or fig leaf.
  • The White House needs the capacity to determine whether top officials know the basic dimensions and identity of the human resources at their call.
  • The White House needs the capacity to know when those doing sensitive government work on taxpayer dollars --whether civil servants or contractors-- are not subject to rules enacted to govern such activities.
  • The White House needs the capacity to know whether resources needed to use and be accountable for contractors are adequate.
  • The White House needs the capacity to determine how well the central tools of accountability are working.

This paper suggests that three competing models or visions for holding contractors to account now co-exist.  Each case has its strengths, but each is sub-optimal. Perhaps other models will emerge.  In any case, the task for the White House is to:

  • Provide the country and itself with a truth-in-government view of the public service (contractors and officials);
  • Provide itself (through OMB and its Office of Federal Procurement Policy) with capacity to understand the reality of the legacy of 20th century reform;
  • Provide leadership in harmonizing the laws, rules, and ethical obligations governing those who do the basic work of government -- whether as civil servant or contractor.

Related Resources

EOM Panel Minutes:
Topic presented at EOM Panel on May 19, 2006.

Associated Presentation Materials:
None

Other Related NAPA Materials:
None

 

 

About the Author
Dan Guttman

Dan Guttman, co author of The Shadow Government, is a Fellow with the Center for Study of American Government at Johns Hopkins University.  He is also a Senior Fellow with the Center for Sustainability and Governance, at the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California Santa Barbara, and a Visiting Professor at the Peking University School of Law in Beijing, China.  Mr. Guttman is also an Attorney, in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Guttman is a former Commissioner of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.  He also served as the Executive Director of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, and as Special Counsel to Senator David Pryor on the staff of the Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Services.  He has shared in journalism awards, most recently for an investigation of $900 billion in Pentagon contracting.

He can be reached at: djguttman@aol.com, or 202 332 0980 (US) or (86) 13482853644 (China).

Name:(optional)
Email Address:
Comments:
(You can use an alias to protect your privacy. Comments will be posted by a moderator)

 


 
 
© 2008 EOM PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION MATERIALS