| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MARCH 5, 2007
CONTACT: Bill Shields
(202) 347-3190
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PANEL FINDS
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUDGET PROCESS MUST BE TRANSFORMED
Washington, DC — March 5, 2007 — A National Academy of Public Administration panel today called on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Congress and the Administration to fundamentally transform the Corps’ budget process.
The Corps has faced mounting criticism of its funding priorities for many years. That criticism came into sharp focus when Hurricanes Katrina and Rita hit the Gulf coast in 2005. These cataclysmic events led Congress to request that the Academy review the Corps’ Civil Works project-by-project budget process.
The Academy panel concluded that changes to the existing budget process will not fix the underlying problems that the Corps and nation face. Academy Fellow Sean O’Keefe, former Deputy Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and current Louisiana State University Chancellor, chaired the panel. O’Keefe said, “The current process has not served the nation as well as it can. It does not give enough attention to system performance and weighing risks if systems fail.”
For 20 years, Congress and the Administration have made funding decisions on the Corps construction program based on cost-shared projects proposed at the local level. And, they have prioritized the projects based on benefit-cost ratios applied to individual new construction projects as they are considered in each annual budget.
Following the New Orleans disaster, independent analyses showed that only a few levees broke, but that was enough for the flood protection system for the entire city to fail. The system was judged to be “a system in name only.” And, many scientists believe that Corps projects built over many years unintentionally undermined the city’s natural storm-surge defenses.
The Academy Panel found that the Corps should not be just the nation’s engineering expert serving primarily single cost-share sponsors. Instead, it must become a reliable steward of the nation’s critical water resource systems and guardian of its global competitiveness in the movement of waterborne goods. It should also be responsible for the safety of at-risk populations and the health of water-reliant ecosystems. Those missions require strategic, systems-based budgeting.
The Corps cannot transform its budget by itself. Congress must change laws; the Corps and other water resources agencies must change their planning and budget guidelines; and the U.S. Office of Management and Budget must change how it reviews the Corps budget. The Academy Panel urges immediate steps to begin this transition.
“It will take time for these fundamental changes to make the nation safer and more resilient,” O’Keefe said. “But, the time to start is now. The next storm will not wait for government to get ready.”
* * *
The National Academy of Public Administration is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit corporation chartered by Congress to provide trusted advice to government agencies on issues of governance and public management. Under its Congressional charter, the Academy is charged with advancing the effectiveness of government at all levels—federal, state and local. For more information about the National Academy of Public Administration, visit http://www.napawash.org.
|